The spokesman for the Combatant Clergy Association said that the seminarians in the revolutionary seminaries have a sense of seriousness and are hard-working and stated, “During and after completing their studies, the seminarians in the revolutionary seminarians have self-control and dignity.”
He pointed out that those who study in the revolutionary seminaries always have a sense of self-dignity and don’t lose themselves to material things and added, “Revolutionary seminarians will never sell their value and credibility for worldly interests.”
Hujjat al-Islam Mesbahi-Moqaddam emphasized that the revolutionary seminaries are seminaries that train students on the level and path of the late Imam Khomeyni and said, “Being revolutionary in the sense of the seminaries means that the seminaries must enter into issues related to the Islamic system of government and engage in efforts to solve the problems of the system.”
His Eminence emphasized that it the revolutionary seminaries must be answerable to the problems of the Islamic system and noted, “The revolutionary seminaries are always trying to solve those problems by observing the problems of the Islamic system.”
He added, “The revolutionary seminaries have always tried to solve those problems by observing the problems of the Islamic system in order that the problems can be solved through the jurisprudence of governance.”
Hujjat al-Islam Mesbahi-Moqaddam stated that it’s essential that the seminaries to provide answers to the issues and problems of the system and therefore, the dominant view of jurisprudence in the seminaries must be the ‘jurisprudence of governance’ and they must not only engage in individual jurisprudence.”
In conclusion, he emphasized pointed out, “Today, we have issues in many fields which have not been resolved yet, especially in the field of economics, and the seminaries must be active in these arenas in a revolutionary manner. For example, the issue of ‘money’ is one of the issues that needs to be updated because the issue of money in the books of jurisprudence is very different from the issue of money used today.”